Skip to content
Free diagnostic

You built it fast. Now it has to be real.

Describe what you've built — with AI tools or otherwise — and get a specific read on where it's most likely to break, what to check today, and what to ask before you spend money on it. No email required. The report is yours either way.

Scroll
01Your brief

Write it the way you’d describe it to another engineer over coffee. Specifics beat polish — a named database and a real symptom are worth more than a paragraph of positioning.

As much as you know. “I'm not sure” is a real answer — it just changes what the diagnostic can tell you.

Symptoms, not diagnoses. What you'd tell someone at 2am.

Where is it right now?
Who built it?

No sign-up, no email gate. The report is yours whether or not you ever talk to us.

The six dimensions

What “production-ready” actually means

This is the ground the diagnostic covers, written out. It is useful on its own — take it to your team and answer the six honestly. Every one of these has a tell: a question that separates a system somebody engineered from one that merely runs.

01

Evals

You can prove a change didn't make things worse.

  • A fixed set of real inputs with known-good outputs, scored automatically — not a handful of prompts somebody tries by hand before a release.
  • The score runs in CI and can block a merge. An eval nobody has wired to a gate is a dashboard, not a test.
  • You know what the score was last month, so you can see drift rather than infer it.

The honest tell: if the answer to “how do you know the new prompt is better?” is “we tried a few things and it seemed good”, you don't have evals — you have vibes with a deploy button.

02

Observability

You find out something broke before a user tells you.

  • Structured logs you can actually query — one line per request with the ids you'd need to reconstruct what happened, not a wall of console output.
  • An alert that fires on the thing that matters to your users (errors, latency, a queue backing up), routed to somebody who is awake.
  • For anything model-driven: the input, the output, the latency, and the cost of every call, retrievable for a specific user complaint.

The honest tell: pick a complaint from last week and try to reconstruct exactly what the system did. If you can't, you're debugging production by guessing.

03

Security and access

Every actor — human, service, or model — can only touch what it needs.

  • Row-level or tenant-level isolation that is enforced by the database, not by remembering to add a WHERE clause in every query.
  • Secrets in a secret store, rotated, and never in the client bundle. Check the bundle; a surprising number of them are.
  • If an LLM can call tools or hit your APIs, it has its own scoped identity and its actions are logged. Prompt injection is an access-control problem before it is a model problem.

The honest tell: if a new engineer could ship a query that returns another tenant's rows and nothing would stop them, the isolation is a convention, not a control.

04

Data handling

You can say what leaves your system, where it goes, and how long it stays.

  • A written answer to which third parties receive customer data — every model provider, analytics tag, and logging service included.
  • PII is not being logged incidentally. Request bodies and model prompts are the two places it leaks most often.
  • Deletion actually deletes: from the database, the backups you'd restore from, and the logs.

The honest tell: your first enterprise customer's security questionnaire will ask all of this in writing. Finding the answers under a deadline is considerably more expensive than finding them now.

05

Load and cost

Being popular is a good day, not an incident.

  • You have run it at several times your current peak and know what fell over first. Nobody's system degrades where they expect.
  • The obvious N+1 queries and unindexed lookups are gone — these are the single most common wall for something built fast.
  • Per-request cost is known and bounded, especially anything calling a model in a loop. A retry storm on a paid API is a bill, not just an outage.

The honest tell: if you don't know which query is slowest under load, you will find out during the launch you were most excited about.

06

Failure and fallback

When a dependency dies, the product degrades instead of disappearing.

  • Timeouts on every outbound call, and retries with backoff on the ones worth retrying. An unbounded retry is an outage amplifier.
  • Work that must not be lost is in a queue with a dead-letter path, not in a fire-and-forget HTTP handler.
  • A defined behaviour for when the model is slow, wrong, or down — a cached answer, a cheaper path, or an honest message. Something, decided in advance.

The honest tell: turn off your least important dependency in staging. If the whole product 500s, you don't have a dependency — you have a single point of failure with a friendly name.

The first two are the discipline behind AI evaluation and observability; the middle two behind AI security and compliance engineering. How we work through all six on a real engagement is written up under methodology.

No mystery

How this thing actually works

We build AI systems for a living, so it would be strange to hand you a black box. Here is exactly what is behind the button.

01

One model call

Your brief goes to Claude Opus 5 with a long system prompt and no tools. It streams back a report in a fixed structure — the read, the ranked failure modes, what to check first, what production-ready means for your case, and what to ask a partner. What you see appearing is the answer being written, not a progress bar.

02

It's told what it doesn't know

The prompt's largest section is about not making things up: never state a fact about your system you didn't give it, never invent a table name or a latency figure, say when it's reasoning from what's typical rather than from what you said. If your brief is too thin, it asks one or two questions instead of guessing. A confident wrong answer would be the worst thing this page could do.

03

It doesn't know us

The model is never told what this company does or sells, cannot quote a price, and is instructed not to mention any engineering firm — including this one. That is why the report reads like a diagnosis rather than a pitch. Everything after it on this page was written by a person.

If the diagnostic is offline or over capacity it says so plainly and sends you to the six dimensions above, which cover the same ground without a model in the loop. What it will never do is fail quietly and leave you looking at a spinner.

Who this is for

Two people keep showing up.

The founder who shipped fast

You built a real product with AI tools in weeks rather than quarters, and it works. Then the first serious customer asked about uptime, or data handling, or what happens when the assistant gets something wrong — and you realised nobody has ever checked. The build was the easy part; this is the part nobody claps for.

The team that sold the AI feature

The demo landed and the contract is signed. Now it has to run in production against real data, and the gap between a demo that impresses and a system that survives a quarter is mostly evals, permissions, and observability — the work that never makes it into the pitch deck.

If it’s worse than that

Some things need people, not a diagnostic.

If the pilot has already stalled and the question is how to finish it, that is Rescue. If you don’t yet know what is worth building, that is an Assessment. Neither one is priced on this site on purpose — the number comes after somebody understands the work, not before.

Questions

Reasonable things to ask

It is free and there is no email gate — the report renders in full before you are asked for anything. The catch, such as it is: we pay for the model call, and the honest hope is that a useful diagnostic makes you consider us when the work gets real. If it doesn't, take the report and go. It costs you nothing and commits you to nothing.

Your brief is sent to Anthropic's API to generate the report and is not stored on our servers. We keep an anonymous count of runs and token usage, nothing else. If — and only if — you fill in the hand-off form at the end, your brief and the report are emailed to our team so a senior engineer can read them before replying. Full detail on our privacy page.

It is a read on a description, and it is written to know that. It reasons about the failure modes your description points at, tells you where it is inferring rather than being told, and says what it could not judge. If your brief is too thin to support a real diagnosis, it asks you one or two questions instead of producing a confident-sounding answer — which is the failure mode most tools like this have.

No. The framing is 'you built something and now it has to be real', and most of what breaks at that point — no tests, no observability, unclear security posture, a wall waiting at load — has nothing to do with models. If there is an LLM in your system, the diagnostic covers evaluation and grounding too. If there isn't, it won't invent an evals section for you.

The model that writes the report has never been told what this company does, cannot quote a price, and is instructed not to mention any engineering firm — including us. Everything on this page that is a pitch was written by a person and sits clearly outside the diagnostic.

There is an optional hand-off at the end of the report: it sends your brief and the diagnostic to a senior engineer, so the conversation starts where you left off instead of at the beginning. That leads to a 30-minute call and a short written recommendation within two business days, either way. You can also just email hello@beyondtechservices.com.

Let's put AI to work in your business.

A 30-minute call. You bring the workflow or the roadmap — we'll tell you what's feasible, what it costs, and what we'd build first.

Book a call