
AI Assessment Feedback for an Online Learning Provider
Rubric-based feedback drafted by AI and approved by instructors, so learners get specific feedback in hours instead of a week.
Instructors spent most of their week grading. Learners waited 6 to 8 days for feedback, and quality varied between graders.
The approach.
- 01Converted each course rubric into explicit criteria with examples at every level.
- 02Drafted feedback per criterion with quotes from the submission.
- 03Instructors approve or edit every grade before release.
- 04Measured agreement with expert graders on double-marked samples.
Claude scores each criterion against the rubric, quotes the passages it relied on and drafts feedback in the course's tone, for instructor approval.
How we measure it.
Time per submission comes from the grading tool. Turnaround is submission to release. Agreement is the correlation with expert grades on a double-marked sample each term.
Before you ask.
No. Beyond Technologies designs it so an instructor approves every grade and comment before a learner sees it.
It connects to Canvas and Moodle through their APIs, and with other platforms through an export and import flow.
Want this measured on your own data? Start with a pilot.
Let's put AI to work in your business.
A 30-minute call. You bring the workflow or the roadmap — we'll tell you what's feasible, what it costs, and what we'd build first.